|
RATE: IMPORTANCE
(1 = "Not
important at all
/ 5 = "Very
important") |
Mean |
Standard
Deviation |
Valid
Respondents |
|
IMP: This
institution
promotes
excellent
employee-student
relationships |
4.55 |
0.65 |
678 |
|
IMP: This
institution
treats students
as its top
priority |
4.65 |
0.63 |
677 |
|
IMP: This
institution does
a good job of
meeting the
needs of
students |
4.63 |
0.63 |
663 |
|
IMP: The
mission,
purpose, and
values of this
institution are
well understood
by most
employees |
4.23 |
0.80 |
651 |
|
IMP: Most
employees are
generally
supportive of
the mission,
purpose, and
values of this
institution |
4.28 |
0.75 |
646 |
|
IMP: The goals
and objectives
of this
institution are
consistent with
its mission and
values |
4.32 |
0.73 |
621 |
|
IMP: This
institution
involves its
employees in
planning for the
future |
4.38 |
0.77 |
653 |
|
IMP: This
institution
plans carefully |
4.44 |
0.72 |
632 |
|
IMP: The
leadership of
this institution
has a clear
sense of purpose |
4.59 |
0.66 |
631 |
|
IMP: This
institution does
a good job of
meeting the
needs of its
faculty |
4.48 |
0.70 |
606 |
|
IMP: This
institution does
a good job of
meeting the
needs of staff |
4.34 |
0.75 |
606 |
|
IMP: This
institution does
a good job of
meeting the
needs of
administrators |
3.99 |
0.97 |
549 |
|
IMP: This
institution
makes sufficient
budgetary
resources
available to
achieve
important
objectives |
4.51 |
0.65 |
607 |
|
IMP: This
institution
makes sufficient
staff resources
available to
achieve
important
objectives |
4.36 |
0.74 |
605 |
|
IMP: There are
effective lines
of communication
between
departments |
4.29 |
0.80 |
618 |
|
IMP:
Administrators
share
information
regularly with
faculty and
staff |
4.35 |
0.76 |
626 |
|
IMP: There is
good
communication
between the
faculty and the
administration
at this
institution |
4.43 |
0.71 |
597 |
|
IMP: There is
good
communication
between staff
and the
administration
at this
institution |
4.29 |
0.78 |
570 |
|
IMP: Faculty
take pride in
their work |
4.63 |
0.58 |
580 |
|
IMP: Staff take
pride in their
work |
4.54 |
0.58 |
584 |
|
IMP:
Administrators
take pride in
their work |
4.48 |
0.68 |
539 |
|
IMP: There is a
spirit of
teamwork and
cooperation at
this institution |
4.49 |
0.73 |
620 |
|
IMP: The
reputation of
this institution
continues to
improve |
4.50 |
0.72 |
608 |
|
IMP: This
institution is
well-respected
in the community |
4.51 |
0.65 |
607 |
|
IMP: Efforts to
improve quality
are paying off
at this
institution |
4.38 |
0.66 |
586 |
|
IMP: Employee
suggestions are
used to improve
our institution |
4.18 |
0.77 |
577 |
|
IMP: This
institution
consistently
follows clear
processes for
selecting new
employees |
4.31 |
0.74 |
580 |
|
IMP: This
institution
consistently
follows clear
processes for
orienting and
training new
employees |
4.23 |
0.75 |
579 |
|
IMP: This
institution
consistently
follows clear
processes for
recognizing
employee
achievements |
4.10 |
0.81 |
588 |
|
IMP: This
institution has
written
procedures that
clearly define
who is
responsible for
each operation
and service |
4.15 |
0.77 |
557 |
|
IMP: The role of
academic
advising is
clearly
articulated and
understood |
4.46 |
0.72 |
632 |
|
IMP: Faculty and
staff are
familiar with
student
responses to the
Student
Satisfaction
Inventory |
3.76 |
0.95 |
622 |
|
IMP: This
institution
seeks input from
faculty and
staff about how
to improve
service to
students |
4.32 |
0.78 |
656 |
|
IMP: This
institution
implements
strategic plans |
4.23 |
0.75 |
610 |
|
RATE: IMPORTANCE
(1 = "Not
important at all
/ 5 = "Very
important") |
Mean |
Standard
Deviation |
Valid
Respondents |
|
IMP: The
institution has
a mechanism for
evaluating
progress towards
meeting
institutional
goals |
4.17 |
0.77 |
585 |
|
IMP: This
institution has
a method of
receiving
feedback from
its employees
about the
quality of
managerial
leadership |
4.26 |
0.85 |
607 |
|
IMP: This
institution
strives to
recruit and
retain a diverse
workforce |
4.21 |
0.89 |
592 |
|
IMP: This
institution
strives to
create a
respectful work
environment free
of
discrimination |
4.55 |
0.66 |
599 |
|
IMP: Policies
and procedures
are clearly
written and
understood |
4.26 |
0.66 |
575 |
|
IMP: Changes in
institutional
policies are
based on input
from all
affected units |
4.30 |
0.71 |
551 |
|
IMP: The
institution does
a good job
evaluating its
physical and
technological
resources and
implements these
items into the
institution’s
master plan |
4.24 |
0.70 |
525 |
|
IMP: The
institution has
adopted policies
regarding
computing
reliability,
integrity, and
security of data |
4.33 |
0.76 |
537 |
|
IMP: Facilities
are inviting,
clean, and
comfortable |
4.41 |
0.67 |
617 |
|
IMP: This
institution
provides
resources for
research/creative
activity |
4.37 |
0.72 |
540 |
|
IMP: Teaching
load
responsibilities
are consistent
with
institutional
expectations for
research/creative
activity |
4.41 |
0.74 |
493 |
|
IMP: Faculty are
familiar with
intended student
learning
outcomes |
4.28 |
0.77 |
509 |
| |
|
|
|
|
RATE:
SATISFACTION (1
= "Not satisfied
at all / 5 =
"Very
satisfied") |
Mean |
Standard
Deviation |
Valid
Respondents |
|
SAT: This
institution
promotes
excellent
employee-student
relationships |
3.13 |
0.99 |
668 |
|
SAT: This
institution
treats students
as its top
priority |
3.00 |
1.02 |
663 |
|
SAT: This
institution does
a good job of
meeting the
needs of
students |
2.95 |
0.92 |
650 |
|
SAT: The
mission,
purpose, and
values of this
institution are
well understood
by most
employees |
2.89 |
1.07 |
641 |
|
SAT: Most
employees are
generally
supportive of
the mission,
purpose, and
values of this
institution |
3.14 |
1.00 |
635 |
|
SAT: The goals
and objectives
of this
institution are
consistent with
its mission and
values |
2.96 |
1.02 |
605 |
|
SAT: This
institution
involves its
employees in
planning for the
future |
2.49 |
1.13 |
634 |
|
SAT: This
institution
plans carefully |
2.50 |
1.06 |
617 |
