Page	Item	Blitz	Spector
1	( c) all previous letters … included in dossier	All previous letters for tenure… be included in dossier
1	(d) narrative statement be limited to three, single spaced pages	Narrative statement be limited to 10 double spaced pages (or space and a half for those who need more words).	Amend to eliminate an artificial, unrealistic limit by deleting the sentence, "The committee recommends that this narrative statement be limited to a total of three, single-spaced pages."
2	Load credit summary of teaching evaluations	Add: based on a uniform 4 point scale, averaged and graphed.
2	Summary of written comments…. to give overall impression…	Add: with comments referenced to numerically evaluated questions
2	( e) Support material - three bulleted items	Add: bullet for electronic files
2	(f) each department develop such guidelines… with the review of the Dean and Provost….	Replace with: -(a) that each department develop guidelines for promotion and tenure based on appropriate standards for their discipline or disciplines, taking into account interdisciplinary work where appropriate; -(b) that departmental standards for promotion and tenure be reviewed by Deans and Provost for the sole purposes of checking consistency with the Collective Agreement and Senate approved policies on Promotion and Tenure; -© that departmentally approved and administratively reviewed departmental standards be deposited with the Senate, which is the repository from which they can be made available to other departments on request. -(d)  that any modifications to departmental standards must be initiated by the department and follow the above procedure.	Amend by clarifying sentence structure, eliminating "discipline-specific," deleting administrative review, adding sharing across the faculty, eliminating ranking of categories, and replacing "Unpublished (or rejected)," with the new sentence to read: Each Department shall develop guidelines for evaluating creative activity, to be reported to the Senate, and shared with the Promotion and Tenure Committee, other departments, and the Administration, in the following broadly defined areas:       peer-reviewed research or creative activity;       sponsor-reviewed research or creative activity;       non-peer reviewed research or creative activity;       in-house research or creative activity; and       ongoing research or creative activity.
2	Creative activity -five bulleted items	Delete: "(or rejected)"
2	For candidates to full professor, only works produced since the last promotion…	Replace "only" with "primarily"
2	(g) 1) scholarly activity be relevant to the individual's field	scholarly activity and research projects be relevant to the individual's field or fields, including interdisciplinary work"	Amend by eliminating the vague "faculty exhibit a breadth of activity."
2	As above	Add: Candidates for promotion to full professor should have external letters from experts in their field(s)	list of activities to be included under "Professional Activity" Amend by adding "Serving as a peer reviewer for journals and/or funding agencies"
3	Bulleted list as "example" of dept. guidelines	Delete entirely
3	The support materials could contain copies of …	Change "should" to "must"
3	Service as a Representative to CCSU - bulleted list	Add: Service on CSU committees and projects
4	(h)		Amend to eliminate ambiguity regarding "recommend" or "must" and to clarify that further consultation is permitted (e.g., between president and dean or department, not just with the immediately preceding level): "In the case of disagreement at a higher level consultation must occur with the previous level before the recommendation is forwarded, and in the case of disagreement with or need for clarification from any other level consultation is permitted." Amend to use what I believe is the correct word by replacing "designate" with "designee."
5	(l)… recommend with reservations, …	Delete	Amend to eliminate ranking and winking in what is a simple dichotomous decision by deleting "strongly recommend" and "recommend with reservations."
5	(m) … recommends with reservations, …	Delete
	(t)  new section		Amendment to give a statement of principle for insertion at the beginning of the motion: The Senate affirms that the promotion and tenure process must be conducted in a non-discriminatory fashion; with respect for individual career, group, and disciplinary differences; with respect for the expertise of faculty in evaluating peers; and with maximum transparency regarding standards and practices consistent with privacy of individual candidates. In keeping with the policy of Central Connecticut State University, unlawful or arbitrary discrimination is prohibited in all determinations regarding promotion and tenure.   No decisions may discriminate against any individual with respect to race, color,  religion, sex, national origin, age, political opinions, sexual orientation, physical disability, or any other conditions established by the law.
	(u) new section		Amendment to require mechanisms for ongoing public, campus-wide discussion of P&T criteria and process, for insertion at the end of the motion: The Promotion and Tenure Committee shall each September organize a series of forums to facilitate open discussion of promotion and tenure criteria and process, with faculty-wide sharing of experience and opinion, and each April present to the Senate and faculty a statistical summary of the year's promotion and tenure cases, including a breakdown by sex, and an evaluation of the year's process to be followed by at least one open faculty forum.  The Deans, and President and/or Provost should be involved in both the September discussion of criteria and process and the April public evaluation of the process.