CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY

BACK TO HOME PAGE


NEASC Steering Committee Meeting

November 13, 2007

MEETING MINUTES

Present:               C. Lovitt, P. Lemma, A. Alling, R. Cernock, R. Bachoo, M. Toston, C. Magnan,
                            L. Wilder, T. Craine, K. Kollar

Committee Member Updates:

T. Craine (Standard 1):   Standard 1 is having trouble answering the substandard entitled Institutional Effectiveness, and T. Craine asked P. Lemma for some suggestions.  T. Craine reported that his committee will be meeting again this month to discuss the appraisal section.

P. Lemma (Standard 2):  P. Lemma reported that she is in the process of collecting pieces of the description section from individual group members.  P. Lemma will be organizing them into one coherent description draft. Standard 2 will be conducting private interviews with various Steering committee members for the appraisal section.  The interviews will be conducted primarily to get feedback regarding the Institutional Effectiveness sections of each standard for the Standard 2 report.  Standard 2 has already conducted an interview with T. Craine concerning the appraisal section.

Further discussion occurred regarding the Institutional Effectiveness piece of the self-study.  Committee members agreed that it was difficult to form a response to this section.  P. Lemma noted that Standard 2 will be primarily responsible for answering the Institutional Effectiveness question as a whole, but that each standard will have to answer this question on their own as it specifically relates to their section of the self-study.  P. Lemma added that if all groups waited to answer this question until they were finished with all three sections of the report then they would be able to form a more cohesive response to the question. 

A. Alling (Standard 3):  A. Alling reported that the Standard 3 description has been rewritten in a line-by-line format, and that she will be sending the rewritten draft to K. Kollar.   A. Alling noted that she met with K. Kollar previous to this meeting to discuss the links for the description section.    

C. Lovitt (Standards 4 & 5):  C. Lovitt notified the committee that he will meet with each of his standards’ chairs on a one-on-one basis to discuss committee progress.  C. Lovitt reported that some of his committees were working on their projections as well as their appraisal sections.

M. Toston (Standard 6):  M. Toston asked K. Kollar for confirmation that her committee’s links are in good shape for the Standard 6 description section.   K. Kollar responded that the links are in good shape and have been added to the electronic table of contents.

R. Cernock (Standard 7):  R. Cernock reported that he has worked on C. Lovitt’s comments for the Standard 7 description.  Standard 7 is also looking for a time when the committee can meet on a weekly basis.  

R. Bachoo (Standard 8):  R. Bachoo reported that he will be doing the final read of the changes made to the Standard 8 description section on Thursday. 

L. Wilder (Standard 9):  L. Wilder reported that his committee is still waiting for some of the financial information to be completed before Standard 9 can complete their description section.  L. Wilder will be writing the description section and submitting it as soon as the financial reports are in.

C. Magnan (Standard 11):  C. Magnan reported that the Standard 11 survey results for their appraisal section will be reviewed on Thursday.  C. Magnan added that the description section is almost completely revised and the appraisal draft should be completed by mid-December.

C. Lovitt asked the group if it was possible to have all description sections completed and turned in by the end of November.  All members agreed that this was a reasonable request.   

Update on Noel Levitz—A. Alling: 

Results for the Noel Levitz survey should be in by next week.  A. Alling reported that the results will first go to the President and the Executive Committee for review and then proceed to other invested parties.  P. Lemma asked A. Alling to key the questions from the survey, indicating which questions pertain to each of the NEASC standards. 

Update on Supporting Link Documents—P. Lemma: 

P. Lemma met with R. Cernock and K. Kollar to discuss alternate ways of linking documents for their self-study, per R. Cernock’s suggestion at the previous Steering Committee meeting.  The decision was made to have all supporting electronic documents placed into a secure folder in order to avoid linking items to the CCSU website or to any other unreliable site.  K. Kollar will save all files to a secure folder that will then be placed on Vista and on a separate disk for the visiting team to access.  

P. Lemma handed out a copy of the table of contents for the electronic documents and asked the committee to review it and let K. Kollar know what reference materials will be utilized for their particular standards.  P. Lemma added that committees should notify K. Kollar of any links being used by their standard that do not appear on the electronic table of contents.

Update on Document Room—P. Lemma:

P. Lemma informed the committee that K. Kollar will be collecting documents for the Document room in the library, and committee members should contact K. Kollar if they have any hard copies they would like to place there.  P. Lemma and K. Kollar are in the process of organizing the room for the NEASC team visit.  P. Lemma reminded the committee that they should only use hard documents if they are unable to provide a link for that particular reference item.  

NEASC Site Team Chair’s Spring Visit—P. Lemma:

P. Lemma informed the committee that there will be a visit from the appointed team chair, Dr. Patricia Meservey, about three to six months before the NEASC team visit.  P. Lemma explained that the purpose of Dr. Meservey’s visit was to talk to the Steering Committee about what she will be doing during the site visit in October.  Dr. Meservey will be meeting with a number of people, in addition to the Steering Committee, possibly including the Chancellor, and the President.  Dr. Meservey will also be working with a contact person (possibly P. Lemma) about the NEASC team’s needs while they are visiting in the fall.  P. Lemma added that before Dr. Meservey’s visit the commission will send her any documents relating to CCSU’s accreditation. 

P. Lemma notified the committee that the other NEASC Team visiting members will be identified in the spring.

Town Meeting:

P. Lemma informed the group that there was supposed to be a town meeting held in the month of November.  After some discussion C. Lovitt agreed it would be better to postpone the meeting until the week of December 10th.  C. Lovitt noted that the committee would need to publicize the description sections prior to this meeting so that they can be discussed.

Action Items:

·         Committees will submit final description drafts to C. Lovitt by November 30th.

·         A Town Meeting will be scheduled for the week of December 10th.

·         Committee members review the electronic document table of contents, make appropriate indications, and return to K. Kollar.

·         Committees send revised description drafts to P. Lemma and K. Kollar to be posted to Vista.

 

The next Steering Committee Meeting will be held on Tuesday, December 11th, at 11:00 a.m. in the President’s Conference Room.

Back to Main Page


1615 Stanley Street, New Britain, CT 06050  860.832.CCSU or toll free instate 1-888-733-2278


 
Copyright © 2005 [Central Connecticut State University]. All rights reserved.
webmaster@ccsu.edu
Last Update: Tuesday September 09, 2008