Focus on Scholarship: Jeremiah
Jarrett
Exploring Biological Questions Large and Small |
|

Professor of Biology Jeremiah N. Jarret in the small coastal town of Las Olas in
Baja California, Mexico, Behind him is one of the rocky coast sites where he has
been studying barnacle population dynamics for the past seven years. |
Jeremiah
Jarrett follows in the tradition of great naturalists such as Charles
Darwin, who studied barnacles—those marine crustaceans often found
cemented, head down, to rocks, pilings, and ships’ hulls. Darwin, whose
barnacle collection resides in London’s Natural History Museum, would be
impressed with Jarrett’s discoveries—questions the evolutionist may have
had, but didn’t get to answer.
Of late, Dr. Jarrett, professor and chair of the Department of Biology,
has focused his scholarship on a unique adaptation in barnacles for
survival. Jarrett, who holds the PhD in biology from Tufts University
and joined CCSU in 1997, says this specific phenomenon is termed
phenotypic plasticity and enables an organism to alter its morphology to
survive prevailing conditions.
For the past six years, under a National Science Foundation grant,
Jarrett has examined barnacle populations and described patterns of
growth, reproduction, and mortality. The $3 million NSF project was
divided between several institutions: CCSU, Woods Hole Oceanographic
Institution, University of North Carolina, CICESE, and Scripps
Institution of Oceanography. In collaboration with colleagues at Woods
Hole on Cape Cod, Jarrett contributed to exploring a large question in
biology: What regulates marine communities? Jarrett comments, “The NSF
initiative was biocomplexity. The idea was to bring together people from
different disciplines to look at what determines the distribution and
abundance of marine organisms.”
Why study barnacles? “The barnacle’s life cycle is similar to
commercially important marine organisms (such as lobsters, scallops, and
crabs), and the larvae and adults are abundant so their populations are
much easier to study,” says Jarrett. “Since |
|
larvae are a critical stage in the life cycles of
marine invertebrates, we need to understand what happens to larvae in
the ocean and how these larvae get back to shore.”
He continues, “We would ultimately like to develop predictive models
that may be usefully applied to commercial fisheries. Further, we’re
trying to predict possible responses of marine organisms to global
climate change and El Nino events.”
Project members studied the distribution and transport of larvae and
patterns of ocean currents. Now, mathematical biologists are processing
the collected data in order to develop the larger model.
Jarrett’s findings to date? “I compared two sites and found barnacle
mortality was much higher and growth rates much lower at the site in
Mexico compared to La Jolla,” he concludes. “What was really interesting
was that at the Mexico site, barnacles were either narrow or bent in
their morphology, and at La Jolla, all the barnacles had an oval
operculum (opening). I thought there’s something strange here! They are
the same species, Chthamalus fissus, but they look very
different.” Jarrett’s findings will appear in the January 2008 issue of
Journal of Crustacean Biology.
Further Research Has Yielded More
One day Jarrett was observing snail predators. To
feed on barnacles, the snail rams its long pointy spine into the
barnacle’s operculum. “I got to thinking if the barnacle had a narrow
operculum or if the opening were on the side of the barnacle, it would
be harder for the predator to kill it,” remembers Jarrett. “I also
observed that the snail population is much larger at the Mexico site and
practically non-existent at La Jolla. I wondered if what I was seeing
was an example of phenotypic plasticity whereby exposure to the predator
at the Mexico site was inducing an adaptive change in morphology.”
To test his idea, Jarrett transplanted juvenile barnacles among the two
study sites and monitored their morphology over nine months. “Sure
enough! Regardless of where the juveniles originated, the juveniles in
Mexico became narrow or bent; the juveniles in La Jolla developed the
oval morphology,” he exclaims.
Subsequently, Jarrett has done predator exposure experiments in the
field. Data support the conclusion that mucous from the predatory snail
induces the change in morphology. One outcome of this research, he says,
“There’s recent evidence that the snail predator population is expanding
further north due perhaps to an increase in water temperature.”
Bemused, he smiles. “The big question in studying plasticity is why
barnacles do not just develop the adaptive morphology (either bent or
narrow)? It ends up that the bent and narrow forms can better survive
predation, but grow much slower and produce fewer offspring. So by being
plastic, barnacles can develop the oval morphology when the predator is
absent, but in the presence of predators, barnacles can develop the
adaptive morphology and at least improve their chances of survival and
reproduction.”
Two New Projects
Jarrett is now studying whether individuals in
barnacle populations further north are capable of developing adaptive
morphologies. “The concern is if the barnacles don’t have this adaptive
capacity, their populations may be decimated by the predator. If that’s
the case, marine reserves and conservation directors should keep a close
eye on this predator, because barnacles are an important food source for
a variety of marine organisms,” he explains.
He lauds his CCSU students who currently are culturing barnacles from
several different populations in Southern California and exposing them
to the predator to see if the barnacles can alter their morphology.
“This research could definitely not have progressed to where it is today
without the work of so many dedicated undergraduate and graduate
students involved!” he declares.
This summer Jarrett journeyed to southwest Ireland on an exploratory
trip looking for evidence of phenotypic plasticity in related species of
barnacles. “Looks like there’s a different mechanism that results in the
plastic response of these barnacles from southwest Ireland. I wonder
why?” he muses.
“That’s what’s exciting about studying biology. There are always new
questions to be answered!”
— Geri Radacsi
|
|
|
|
|